On April 13, 2026, Auguste secured 48.4% of the vote, defeating her opponent Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné, who garnered 46.8%. The margin of victory was 731 votes, with Auguste receiving a total of 22,445 votes. This byelection saw a voter turnout of 50.76%, reflecting a robust engagement from the electorate.

The backdrop to this election is critical. The Supreme Court of Canada invalidated Auguste’s previous victory in February 2026, leading to this rematch. The Terrebonne riding had been a stronghold for the Bloc Québécois since the 1980s, making Auguste’s win a notable achievement for the Liberal Party.

In her victory speech, Auguste stated, “For me, the difference in this campaign was that people know me now. I was their MP for nine months and they know what kind of person I am and how I work.” This sentiment underscores the importance of familiarity and trust in political campaigns.

Sinclair-Desgagné congratulated her adversaries and acknowledged the resources deployed during the campaign, indicating a competitive race. She remarked, “It took a separatist to teach the rest of Canada a lesson in democracy,” highlighting the broader implications of this election.

Following this byelection, the Liberal Party has gained a total of 174 seats in the House of Commons, further solidifying their position in Canadian politics. The outcome in Terrebonne could signal a shift in voter sentiment, especially in regions previously dominated by the Bloc Québécois.

As the political landscape evolves, the implications of Auguste’s victory will unfold in the coming weeks. The focus will now shift to how this result influences future elections and party strategies in Quebec and beyond.

Сообщение Terrebonne by election: Terrebonne Byelection Results: Tatiana Auguste Secures Victory Again появились сначала на justrealnews.

In a significant political development, Mark Carney has categorically ruled out the possibility of proroguing Parliament as Canada prepares for crucial byelections on April 13. This decision comes as the Liberal Party aims to secure a thin majority government by winning two out of three contested seats.

The byelections will take place in Toronto ridings University-Rosedale and Scarborough Southwest, as well as the Quebec riding of Terrebonne. Advance polls are open from April 3 to 6, and the stakes are high for the Liberals, who could reach a total of 172 MPs if they succeed in gaining two seats, effectively matching the opposition parties’ combined votes.

Carney expressed his surprise at the mere suggestion of prorogation, stating, “It has never even entered my thinking, the possibility of [proroguing].” He emphasized the government’s commitment to working with Parliament to advance legislation, dismissing any notion that proroguing was under consideration.

Historically, proroguing Parliament has been a common practice, often without controversy. However, since the 2008 parliamentary dispute, it has garnered a negative connotation, leading to concerns that such a move could be perceived as a political maneuver. Nelson Wiseman noted that proroguing would likely be viewed unfavorably.

Despite Carney’s dismissal, procedural expert Philippe Bolduc suggested that the option of proroguing may still be on the table as a management strategy for the House. If the Liberals do not win all three byelections, they may face challenges in passing motions to alter committee compositions.

Importantly, proroguing Parliament would reset the House agenda but would not affect committee standings due to a motion passed in June that locked them in for the duration of Parliament. The Speaker of the House, Francis Scarpaleggia, is expected to vote to maintain the status quo, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.

As the byelections approach, the implications of any potential prorogation on the legislative agenda remain unclear. Details remain unconfirmed regarding how the Speaker would vote in a tie situation if the Liberals fail to achieve a majority.

Сообщение Prorogue Parliament: Mark Carney Dismisses Suggestions Amid Byelections появились сначала на justrealnews.

Before the recent developments surrounding Bill C-9, known as the Combatting Hate Act, there was a growing expectation among advocates for stronger hate speech laws in Canada. The bill aimed to address the rising tide of hate crimes and discrimination, particularly against identifiable groups. However, the legislative journey had been fraught with delays and debates over its implications, especially concerning religious freedoms.

The decisive moment came when Bill C-9 passed its final vote in the House of Commons with 186 votes in favor and 137 against. This marked a significant shift in the legislative landscape, as the bill now moves to the Senate for further study. The bill proposes new Criminal Code offences, including criminalizing the intentional promotion of hatred against identifiable groups in public, particularly through the use of hate or terrorism-related symbols.

The implications of this bill are profound for various stakeholders. The Bloc Québécois supported the bill, while the Conservatives and NDP opposed it. The removal of the religious exemption from Canada’s hate speech law has raised alarms among many, including over 350 Muslim organizations and various religious leaders, who argue that this could limit religious expression and freedom. The bill also introduces severe penalties, including up to 10 years in prison for obstructing access to places of worship.

Justice Minister Sean Fraser defended the amendment, stating, “The amendment ‘will not criminalize faith.'” However, critics like Bishop Pierre Goudreault have expressed concerns, emphasizing that the exemption has historically served as a safeguard to protect sincere religious expression. “It has served for many years as an essential safeguard to ensure that Canadians are not criminally prosecuted for their sincere, truth-seeking expression of beliefs made without animus and grounded in long-standing religious traditions,” he stated.

Supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to combat hate speech effectively. Kevin Lamoureux, a member of the Liberal party, asserted, “The bill would not take away the religious rights of Canadians or hamper their ability to quote from scripture.” This perspective highlights a growing urgency to address hate crimes while balancing the rights of religious individuals.

Despite the government’s push for the bill, the concerns raised by various religious organizations cannot be overlooked. The National Council of Canadian Muslims expressed hope that amendments could be made to address their worries, stating, “We have worked with optimism that the text could be amended to assuage our concerns.” This sentiment reflects the ongoing tension between combating hate and preserving religious freedoms.

As the Senate prepares to study the bill, it may suggest changes before it officially becomes law. The outcome of this legislative process will be critical in determining how Canada navigates the complex intersection of hate speech and religious freedom. The removal of the religious exemption has been a point of contention for many years, with arguments that it could be used to promote homophobia, racial abuse, and antisemitism. Details remain unconfirmed regarding potential amendments or the Senate’s stance on the bill.

Сообщение Bill c9 canada: Bill C-9 Canada Passes Final Vote in House of Commons появились сначала на justrealnews.

What does the passage of Bill C-9 mean for religious freedoms in Canada? The bill, known as the Combatting Hate Act, has advanced to the Senate after a contentious vote in the House of Commons, where it passed with 186 votes in favor and 137 against.

This legislation criminalizes intimidation and obstruction outside establishments used by faith-based groups and bans the intentional flaunting of certain terrorism or hate symbols in public. Notably, it repeals the good faith religious speech defense from Canada’s hate speech laws, a move that has sparked significant backlash.

Justice Minister Sean Fraser has assured that the new legislation will not criminalize faith, stating, “The new legislation won’t criminalize faith.” However, critics argue that the removal of the religious exemption poses a serious threat to religious freedoms. The Conservatives, NDP, and Green Party MP Elizabeth May were among those who dissented against the bill.

Over 350 Muslim organizations and leaders from various religious communities have expressed their opposition to the removal of the religious-text defense, highlighting concerns about the implications for free speech and religious expression. Bishop Pierre Goudreault remarked, “The elimination of the religious-text defence raises significant concerns as it has served for many years as an essential safeguard.”

The Bloc Québécois made the amendment to remove the religious exemption a non-negotiable condition for their support of the bill. This political maneuvering has intensified the debate surrounding the legislation.

On March 25, 2026, the House of Commons voted against a proposition to stop the third reading of the bill, with 188 votes against and 125 in favor. The Senate is expected to begin studying Bill C-9 on April 14, following the Easter recess, where further discussions and potential amendments may take place.

As the Senate prepares to review the bill, the implications for various faith communities remain a pressing concern. David Cooke, a pro-life advocate, warned, “With the passage of Bill C-9 in the House, Christians and pro-life advocates will almost certainly face an entirely new level of hostility.”

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the potential changes the Senate may propose, but the outcome of this legislation could have lasting effects on the landscape of religious expression in Canada.

Сообщение Bill c9: Bill C-9 Advances in Parliament Amid Controversy появились сначала на justrealnews.