“With one exception, each of them has demonstrated overwhelmingly that she suffered one or more sexual assaults at the hands of Mr. Rozon,” stated Judge Chantal Tremblay during the verdict announcement.

In a significant ruling, Gilbert Rozon has been ordered to pay $880,000 to eight women who accused him of sexual assault and misconduct. The civil trial, which spanned ten months, concluded with the judge affirming that all but one plaintiff met the burden of proof.

The plaintiffs had sought a total of $14 million in damages, highlighting the severity of their claims against the former Just For Laughs founder. Rozon, who has consistently denied the allegations, claimed that he had consensual relations with three of the women involved.

Judge Tremblay emphasized the importance of the judgment, stating, “This judgment therefore aims to bring this long trial to a close and to reaffirm that an infringement of personal integrity, when proven, calls for a legal response proportionate to the extent of the harm suffered.”

The incidents in question occurred between 1980 and 2004, with Rozon stepping down from his position at Just For Laughs in 2017 following the allegations. Notably, Annick Charette’s complaint led to criminal charges against Rozon, but he was found not guilty.

Rozon also countersued four women for defamation, but this was rejected by the judge. The plaintiffs included Patricia Tulasne, Lyne Charlebois, Anne-Marie Charette, Annick Charette, Sophie Moreau, Danie Frenette, Guylaine Courcelles, Mary Sicari, and Martine Roy, with Charette awarded $95,000 in damages.

Martine Roy expressed gratitude for the women who came forward, stating, “Today, I honour the brave women who have spoken up, thank you for your courage and solidarity.” Annick Charette added, “Few victims have the means to pursue a civil process, and few perpetrators have the means to compensate those same victims.”

The civil trial was part of a long legal battle that began as a class-action lawsuit but transitioned into individual suits after a 2020 Quebec Court of Appeal ruling.

As the legal ramifications of this case unfold, the focus remains on the impact of the verdict on victims’ rights and the broader conversation surrounding sexual misconduct.

Сообщение Gilbert Rozon Ordered to Pay $880,000 in Civil Trial появились сначала на justrealnews.

The grounding of the USNS Big Horn in the Northern Arabian Sea on September 23, 2024, has resulted in over $20 million in damages. This incident not only highlights the risks associated with maritime navigation but also raises serious questions about the decision-making processes aboard naval vessels. The ship, measuring 677 feet in length, was operating under conditions that ultimately led to its grounding after the captain opted for a shorter but riskier route.

Causes of the Incident

The grounding occurred when the captain decided to take the Duqm A route, which was 10 miles shorter than the standard path. This decision was made despite the ship’s fathometer indicating progressively shallower water leading up to the incident. The captain’s command to “Let’s try to shoot the gap there” reflects a willingness to take risks that ultimately proved detrimental.

Navigation Errors and Equipment Issues

Compounding the situation, the USNS Big Horn was operating with two separate electronic navigation chart databases, which caused confusion among the officers on watch. The Navy’s investigation revealed that the captain and watchstanders failed to adequately monitor navigation alerts that could have averted the grounding. At the time of the incident, the ship was traveling at a speed of 17 to 18 knots.

Immediate Aftermath

Following the grounding, the captain reported fuel leaks on both main engines, indicating significant damage to the vessel. The ship was subsequently towed into Duqm for repairs. The violent shaking experienced during the grounding raised immediate concerns for the crew’s safety and the ship’s operational integrity.

Investigation Findings

The Navy’s investigation concluded that the grounding was preventable, emphasizing the need for improved navigational practices and adherence to safety protocols. The captain’s remarks, such as “If we cut corners we’ll get there,” underscore a troubling attitude towards navigation that prioritizes speed over safety.

Context of the Incident

Prior to the grounding, the USNS Big Horn was completing its final replenishment-at-sea with ships from the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group. This operational context adds another layer of complexity to the incident, as the ship was engaged in critical support activities for naval operations in the region.

Looking Ahead

As investigations continue, the Navy is expected to implement stricter navigational protocols to prevent similar incidents in the future. The grounding of the USNS Big Horn serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of vigilance and adherence to established maritime safety practices. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential disciplinary actions against the crew involved in the incident.

Сообщение USNS Big Horn Ran Aground: Consequences and Investigation появились сначала на justrealnews.