The decisive moment came on April 13, 2026, when the court ordered Lafarge to pay a fine of 1.12 million euros and confiscated 30 million euros worth of its assets. The court’s findings revealed that Lafarge had paid a total of 5.59 million euros to armed groups, including ISIL and the al-Nusra Front, to secure safe passage for its operations.

Eight former Lafarge employees, including former CEO Bruno Lafont, were found guilty of financing terrorism, with Lafont receiving a six-year jail sentence. Christian Herrault, the former deputy managing director, was sentenced to five years. This ruling marks the first time a company has been tried and convicted in France for such serious charges.

Judge Isabelle Prevost-Desprez emphasized the court’s view that the funding was solely aimed at keeping the Syrian plant operational for economic reasons. “It is clear to the court that the sole purpose of the funding of a terrorist organisation was to keep the Syrian plant running for economic reasons,” she stated.

In total, Lafarge acknowledged paying nearly 13 million euros to middlemen to maintain its cement factory in Jalabiya, which began operations in 2010, just months before the Syrian uprising. The payments not only supported the company’s operations but also inadvertently bolstered groups responsible for deadly attacks in Syria and beyond.

The implications of this ruling extend beyond Lafarge, as it sets a precedent for corporate accountability in cases of terrorism financing. Sherpa and ECCHR, organizations advocating for corporate responsibility, hailed the decision as historic in the fight against multinational corporations’ impunity.

Cannelle Lavite, an expert on corporate governance, noted that the court established that Lafarge had mobilized financial, human, and political resources to preserve its economic interests amid the conflict. This conviction could lead to increased scrutiny of other corporations operating in conflict zones.

As the legal ramifications unfold, Lafarge has acknowledged the court’s findings, referring to the case as a legacy matter involving conduct from over a decade ago. However, the ruling signals a new era of accountability for corporations involved in similar situations.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding potential appeals or further legal actions against Lafarge or its executives. The global business community will be watching closely as this case develops, potentially reshaping the landscape of corporate ethics and accountability.

Сообщение Lafarge Convicted of Financing Terrorism in France появились сначала на justrealnews.

During the Syrian civil war, Lafarge paid approximately 5.59 million euros to armed groups, including ISIL and the al-Nusra Front, to keep its Jalabiya plant operational. This facility began operations in 2010, just months before the uprising in early 2011.

Judge Isabelle Prevost-Desprez stated, “The sole purpose of the funding of a terrorist organisation was to keep the Syrian plant running for economic reasons,” emphasizing the gravity of the company’s actions. Lafarge also admitted to paying nearly 13 million euros to middlemen to maintain operations amid escalating violence.

This case is unprecedented in France, as it is the first time a company has been tried for financing terrorism. Lafarge is also under investigation for alleged complicity in crimes against humanity, further complicating its legal troubles.

In a related case in the United States, Lafarge faced similar charges, resulting in a total of $778 million in forfeiture and fines. The company acknowledged the court’s findings regarding conduct that occurred over a decade ago.

Former employees have voiced their concerns, stating, “Lafarge was aware of what was happening to us – the checkpoints, the threats, the daily fear – but chose to risk the lives of its employees for profit.” This sentiment underscores the ethical implications of Lafarge’s decisions during the conflict.

Lafarge has expressed its commitment to addressing this legacy matter responsibly, calling the ruling an important milestone in its efforts to rectify past actions. However, the long-term impact on the company’s reputation and operations remains to be seen.

As observers await further developments, the implications of this ruling could resonate throughout the corporate world, prompting a reevaluation of how companies engage in conflict zones.

Сообщение Lafarge Cement Found Guilty of Financing Terrorism in Syria появились сначала на justrealnews.

Previously, Lafarge had operated under the expectation that its business interests could be maintained without facing legal repercussions for its actions during the Syrian civil war. However, the court revealed that between 2013 and 2014, Lafarge paid €5.5 million to terrorist groups, including the Islamic State and Nusra Front, to keep its cement plant operational amidst the chaos.

The decisive moment came when the court recognized that senior executives at Lafarge had enabled these payments through a system of opaque financial arrangements designed to conceal their dealings with armed groups. Four former executives were also found guilty, receiving prison sentences ranging from three to six years.

This ruling has immediate effects on the parties involved. Lafarge’s conviction not only tarnishes its reputation but also sets a legal precedent that could impact other corporations operating in conflict zones. The court’s decision emphasizes that French parent companies can no longer evade responsibility by hiding behind foreign subsidiaries.

Experts have noted that this landmark ruling is historic in two ways: it holds Lafarge accountable for its actions and reinforces the principle that corporations must adhere to ethical standards, even in challenging environments. “Payments to terrorist entities enabled Lafarge to continue its operations,” stated Prevost-Desprez, highlighting the gravity of the situation.

Furthermore, the court’s decision has broader implications for access to justice, as it has been reported that Syrian employees of Lafarge are still awaiting compensation, with access to justice denied. This aspect underscores the ongoing struggles faced by individuals in conflict zones when corporations prioritize profit over ethical considerations.

As the legal ramifications unfold, Lafarge’s case serves as a cautionary tale for other companies, emphasizing the importance of corporate responsibility and ethical business practices in the face of adversity.

Сообщение Lafarge Convicted of Financing Terrorism in Syria появились сначала на justrealnews.

In a recent development, nearly 400 terrorism suspects were convicted in a mass trial held in the capital, Abuja. Out of 508 cases brought to court, 386 resulted in convictions, while 8 were discharged and 2 acquitted. The charges primarily revolved around participation in attacks or providing support to militant groups.

Lateef Fagbemi, the lead prosecutor, stated, “We brought 508 cases to court and out of this number, we were able to secure 386 convictions, eight discharges, two acquittals and 112 cases to the next session or phase.” Many of those convicted received prison terms of up to 20 years, reflecting the severity of their crimes.

International observers monitored the court proceedings, emphasizing the global interest in Nigeria’s fight against terrorism. However, the situation remains dire, as disputes between Muslim Fulani herders and Christian farming communities have escalated into deadly clashes, further complicating the security landscape.

In light of these events, public figures have voiced their concerns about the international community’s response to the violence. Comedian John Cleese criticized the silence surrounding anti-Christian terrorism in Nigeria, stating, “It looks rather as though Black Lives Don’t Matter.” He further remarked, “Also, writing about it would damage the image of the murderers who killed these poor people.”

Recent attacks have underscored the urgency of the situation, with at least 26 people killed in three separate Easter attacks in northern Nigeria. Activist Leo Terrell questioned, “Why isn’t the world talking about the massacre of Christians by Islamist terrorists??!!!!”

As Nigeria continues to grapple with these challenges, observers are left wondering what the future holds for the nation. The mass trials may represent a step forward in addressing the insurgency, but the underlying issues remain unresolved. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the next phases of the trials and the broader implications for security in the region.

Сообщение Nigeria Sees Mass Convictions in Terrorism Trials Amid Ongoing Insurgency появились сначала на justrealnews.

Rima Hassan, a French Member of the European Parliament, was denied entry to Canada on March 29, 2026. This decision came as she was scheduled to speak at two conferences in Montreal, raising significant concerns regarding freedom of expression and political representation.

Initially, Hassan’s request for travel authorization was approved by Canadian authorities. However, this approval was later revoked, citing her failure to disclose a prior visa refusal to Israel and a previous criminal offense. Hassan had been denied entry to Israel in February 2025, which has now become a focal point in her travel complications.

While complaints had been filed against her for glorifying terrorism, she was never convicted. In response to the denial, B’nai Brith Canada and the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs praised the Canadian government’s decision, emphasizing that “Canada is not a platform for those who justify terrorism, glorify violence, and deny Jewish history.”

Hassan, however, contends that the denial was influenced by pro-Israel lobbying organizations. She expressed her frustration, stating, “J’ai été empêchée de me rendre au Canada : une entrave préoccupante à l’action parlementaire et à la liberté d’expression,” which translates to a worrying impediment to parliamentary action and freedom of expression.

Despite the entry denial, Hassan confirmed she will deliver her conferences remotely. La France Insoumise condemned the decision, arguing that it represents a troubling trend of restricting political representatives’ freedom of movement.

The Political Science Student Association of Concordia University expressed outrage over the ban, highlighting the implications for academic discourse and political engagement.

Canadian authorities have not publicly detailed the specific reasons for the entry denial, leaving many questions unanswered. Details remain unconfirmed.

As this situation unfolds, observers are closely monitoring the implications for international political discourse and the ongoing debates surrounding freedom of expression in Canada.

Сообщение Rima hassan canada: Rima Hassan Denied Entry to Canada Amid Controversy появились сначала на justrealnews.

Rima Hassan, a Member of the European Parliament representing La France Insoumise, has been barred from entering Canada for two scheduled conferences on March 30 and 31, 2026. This decision has sparked significant controversy, with implications for parliamentary action and freedom of expression.

The Canadian authorities initially authorized Hassan’s travel but later opened a review of her request, leading to the denial. Hassan described this obstruction as a worrying infringement on her rights as a parliamentarian.

Critics have accused Hassan of antisemitism and glorification of terrorism, citing her previous statements supporting Hamas actions as “legitimate.” French lawyer Richard Malka characterized her political trajectory as a “left of darkness,” further intensifying the scrutiny surrounding her.

In 2019, Hassan founded the Observatory of Refugee Camps, advocating for Palestinian rights. However, her involvement in humanitarian flotillas and solidarity actions has drawn ire, particularly from organizations like the Centre consultatif des relations juives et israéliennes (CIJA), which has called for the denunciation of her visit to Canada.

Compounding the controversy, eight members of the Jeune Garde militia were implicated in a violent assault linked to an event attended by Hassan, raising alarms about her associations. The alleged victim in this incident was just 15 years old.

Hassan’s party has pointed out that she has faced denied entry to other states without resulting convictions for glorifying terrorism, suggesting that the current situation may be politically motivated.

The planned forums in Canada were intended to address resistance to the far right and solidarity movements. However, opponents argue that inviting Hassan normalizes extremist rhetoric.

The remote conferences will proceed as scheduled, and stakeholders on all sides are expected to issue further statements in the coming days. Details remain unconfirmed.

Сообщение Rima Hassan Barred from Canada Amid Controversy появились сначала на justrealnews.

In early February 2026, California found itself at the center of heightened security concerns following a warning issued by the FBI. The alert indicated that Iran could potentially retaliate for American military actions by launching drones at the West Coast. This development marks a significant shift in the state’s security landscape, as officials grapple with the implications of such threats amidst ongoing geopolitical tensions.

Decisive Changes and Immediate Responses

The FBI’s warning was based on intelligence that suggested Iran might conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) from an unidentified vessel off the U.S. coast. While the memo circulated among Joint Terrorism Task Force partners across California, officials were quick to emphasize that there was no confirmed or imminent threat to the state. The alert served as a precautionary measure, reflecting the ongoing monitoring of global events rather than evidence of an active attack plan.

Direct Effects on Local Authorities

In response to the warning, California’s Governor’s Office of Emergency Services began collaborating closely with security officials to enhance community protection. The LA Sheriff’s Department has maintained an elevated level of readiness, demonstrating the state’s commitment to ensuring public safety. Governor Gavin Newsom remarked, “Drone issues have been top of mind and we’ve assembled some work groups specifically around those concerns,” highlighting the proactive steps taken to address potential threats.

Expert Perspectives on the Threat

Experts have weighed in on the feasibility of Iran successfully executing a strike against the U.S. mainland, cautioning that such an operation would be both difficult and risky for any foreign actor. The drones referenced in the FBI’s warning are military-style UAVs, which further complicates the scenario. A source familiar with the memo stated, “The warning was cautionary and there was no indication Iran was planning an attack or that it could successfully launch one.” This perspective underscores the importance of context in evaluating the threat level.

Ongoing Coordination and Safety Measures

California officials have emphasized that the warning reflects a broader effort to monitor and respond to potential threats. A spokesperson for the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services noted, “While we can’t discuss sensitive details, Californians should know that this kind of coordination happens every day to keep people safe.” This statement reinforces the commitment of local authorities to maintain vigilance and preparedness in the face of evolving threats.

Uncertainties and Future Considerations

Despite the proactive measures being taken, uncertainties remain regarding the exact timing, method, and target of any potential attack. The credibility of the intelligence behind the warning has not been confirmed, leaving officials and the public with lingering questions. As California navigates this complex landscape, the emphasis on collaboration and readiness will be critical in ensuring the safety of its communities.

As California confronts the implications of the FBI’s warning about a potential drone threat from Iran, the state’s response reflects a commitment to public safety amid global tensions. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing assessments and preparations in place to address any emerging threats. Details remain unconfirmed, but the proactive stance taken by California officials highlights the importance of vigilance in an increasingly complex security environment.

Сообщение California Faces Iran Drone Threat Amid Heightened Security Measures появились сначала на justrealnews.

Sleeper cells are covert operatives or assets that remain inactive until activated for a specific purpose. Recent warnings from federal authorities indicate that these cells could be activated in retaliation for U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, raising alarms about potential threats in both the United States and Canada.

In the wake of heightened tensions, the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security have been on alert since the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. This event has intensified scrutiny on sleeper cells, particularly those linked to Iran and its proxies, such as Hezbollah and the Islamic State.

Doug Ford, the Premier of Ontario, suggested that sleeper cells may exist in Canada, although authorities have not confirmed this. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) has previously thwarted a planned terror attack in Toronto in 2024, highlighting ongoing concerns about domestic threats.

Recent intelligence reports indicate that an encrypted communication believed to have originated in Iran may have been intended to activate sleeper assets outside the country. The sudden appearance of a new radio transmission station has further fueled fears of sleeper cells operating in Western countries, as the transmission detected was likely intended for clandestine recipients who possess an encryption key.

The Department of Homeland Security issued a threat assessment stating that Iran relies on individuals with pre-existing access to the U.S. for surveillance and plotting. The number of Iranian nationals in Southern California exceeds 700,000, the largest population outside Iran, which has raised concerns about potential sleeper cell activities in the region.

Historically, Iran has attempted to hire assassins to kill U.S. officials, and the Los Angeles Police Department has been preparing for various terrorist threats since the September 11 attacks. President Trump stated, “We’re watching every single one of them, yeah. We know a lot about them,” emphasizing the need for vigilance in monitoring these potential threats.

As authorities continue to investigate, uncertainties remain regarding the exact contents of the encrypted transmission and the existence of sleeper cells in Canada. Details remain unconfirmed, but the situation underscores the ongoing threat posed by sleeper cells and the need for heightened awareness and preparedness among security agencies.

Сообщение What Are Sleeper Cells: Understanding Covert Operatives in the U.S. and Canada появились сначала на justrealnews.

The recent interception of an encrypted transmission believed to have originated in Iran raises significant concerns regarding sleeper cells potentially operating outside the country. This situation prompts the question: how serious is the threat posed by these sleeper cells, and what actions are being taken in response?

U.S. law enforcement agencies have reported that the intercepted transmission may serve as an operational trigger for sleeper assets positioned beyond Iran’s borders. The alert, which was disseminated shortly after the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, indicated that the transmission was encoded and intended for clandestine recipients who possess the necessary encryption key. This has led to increased vigilance among U.S. authorities regarding potential threats.

Details of the Intercepted Transmission

The alert cited preliminary signals analysis, noting that the transmission was relayed across multiple countries and appeared as a newly emerged station with international rebroadcast characteristics. While the exact contents of these transmissions cannot currently be determined, officials stress that the sudden appearance of such a station warrants heightened situational awareness. The alert did not specify a particular operational threat or target, but it did suggest that the broadcasts could activate or provide instructions to sleeper assets operating outside Iran.

Senator Ted Cruz remarked on the situation, stating, “Sleeper cells carrying out acts of terrorism here in the United States, the administration is being vigilant.” This underscores the seriousness with which U.S. officials are treating the potential implications of the intercepted transmission. Charles Marino, a former law enforcement officer, added, “The fact is nobody, if they’re speaking honestly, from U.S. intelligence or law enforcement can tell you as a matter of fact how badly we’ve been infiltrated here in the United States.” This highlights the uncertainties surrounding the extent of any infiltration by sleeper cells.

What Comes Next?

In response to this alert, law enforcement agencies have been instructed to heighten monitoring for suspicious radio-frequency activity. This proactive measure aims to preemptively address any potential threats that may arise from the activation of sleeper cells. However, the specifics of what assets could be activated in response to the situation remain unclear.

As the situation develops, details remain unconfirmed regarding the exact contents of the intercepted transmissions and the nature of any potential threats posed by sleeper cells. The ongoing monitoring and analysis by U.S. law enforcement will be crucial in determining the next steps and ensuring public safety.

Сообщение Sleeper cells: U.S. Law Enforcement on Alert Following Intercepted Transmission from Iran появились сначала на justrealnews.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is looking into “indicators” that may point to a potential terrorism connection following a bar shooting in Austin early on Sunday, March 1, which resulted in the deaths of at least two individuals and left 14 others injured.

According to the Austin Police, two individuals lost their lives in the shooting incident, and Police Chief Lisa Davis confirmed during a press briefing that law enforcement fatally shot the suspect.

Davis reported that the individual drove around Buford’s Backyard Beer Garden multiple times in an SUV shortly before 2 a.m. local time, halted, and then discharged a firearm from the vehicle. Afterward, he parked, exited the car, and continued to fire both the pistol and a rifle.

Davis reported that officers assigned to the entertainment area where the bar is situated shot and killed the assailant.

Officials have not yet disclosed the name of the suspect, but reports from the Associated Press, Austin NBC affiliate KXAN, and the Austin American-Statesman, citing unnamed sources, indicate that the individual is 53-year-old Ndiaga Diagne. Both the AP and the Statesman noted that Diagne hails from Senegal. USA TODAY has contacted the FBI to verify the identity of the suspect.

Fourteen individuals were taken to the hospital following the incident. According to Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services Chief Robert Luckritz during the press briefing, three of those transported were in critical condition. He noted that medical teams arrived at the location in under a minute.

"I firmly believe that the swift actions of the police officers, EMS teams, and other professionals played a crucial role in making a difference and saving lives," stated Austin Mayor Kirk Watson during the press conference.

At a press briefing, Alex Doran, the acting head of the FBI’s San Antonio division, remarked that the individual exhibited “signs both in the subject and within his vehicle that suggest a possible connection to terrorism.”

Doran refrained from revealing the specifics of the "indicators" when questioned during the press conference, stating that "we are still in the very preliminary phases of the investigation and we wouldn't want to risk influencing any subsequent investigative measures."

Karoline Leavitt, the Press Secretary for the White House, stated in a message on X that President Donald Trump has been "informed about the shooting incident."

Texas Democratic Representative Greg Casar, representing East Austin, stated in a social media post that he “will advocate for complete transparency for the families and the public.” Republican Senator John Cornyn mentioned in a post on X that FBI Director Kash Patel informed him during a phone conversation that the Austin Police “is leading the investigation, with assistance from the FBI.”

The incident took place on the same day that at least nine individuals were hurt in a mass shooting during an event at a concert venue in Cincinnati. According to the Gun Violence Archive, there have been 56 mass shootings in 2026 where four or more people sustained injuries.

Contributors: N’dea Yancey-Bragg, USA TODAY

This narrative has been revised to include additional details.

Сообщение Austin shooting: FBI Investigates Possible Terrorism Link in Bar Attack появились сначала на justrealnews.